Thank you, Dragon Con
1 month ago
A female James Bond...has it been done before? Probably. I just can't think of a book or film that comes to mind. I never saw JJ Abram's Alias TV show...that might have been similar. But here's a new female spy comic book from writer Ed Brubaker and artist Steve Epting. Brubaker, as you know, did a stellar run writing Captain America recently. While the broughaha was that he killed Steve Rogers, what he also did was make it a great book people talked about for the first time in decades. He quit Marvel to focus on his creator-owned book which was probably a good thing since his Winter Soldier book was barely compelling and his heart didn't seem into it. Fatale, his Satanic/monsters/crime mash-up book for Image, has been gang-busters, though, so he definitely is still a terrific writer when he cares. , though, so far is paint-by-numbers stuff. The art by Epting is top-notch and it's intriguing but not all-together great. Velvet is a spy in the 70's who ends up being falsely accused of being a villain and she must go on the run and apparently find out who's double-crossing her. It's a decent first issue but not something that screams originality or something that'd make you dying to get your hands on #2. **
Jim Lee is, obviously, one of the big dogs in comics. The one smart thing that Dan Didio and the crew at DC did when they started was to get him the hell out of the corporate office and back at the drawing table. Jim Lee penciled the first eight or so issues of Justice League, which looked pretty but were mediocre. Now they've put Lee on a new monthly Superman title with one of DC's biggest writers, Scott Snyder. Instant gold, right? Hardly. First off: they should have called this book Man of Steel. Superman Unchained is a lousy title (I'm guessing they watched Django Unchained right before this brilliant title idea). Second: the book is pretty bad. Perhaps if I hadn't read Snyder and Capullo's Batman #22 right after this I wouldn't have thought this. That book, amidst a year long origin tale, is fantastic. looks good but not great. Lee gets a little lazy in spots. The plot is very dull, too. General Lane has created a more powerful, Superman-like creature for no apparent reason. & Luthor is in some high-tech suit ready to do something...evil. Snyder perhaps hasn't found his "voice" yet with Superman. That, or he's just better off with the dark elements of comics like Batman, serial killers, and vampires. This new book isn't awful but it just is average at best. ** (out of ****)
Back in the day (I'm old), Marvel used to have a bunch of Spider-Man titles. He is their premium character, right? So it makes sense to load the market with his books. The early 90's had The Amazing Spider-Man, Spider-Man, Spectacular Spider-Man, and Web of Spider-Man. I was a kid so I don't remember if all the titles were out at the same time...but basically every week you could read a Spider-Man book and if you didn't like one writer or one artist you could just pick the one book you enjoyed. DC realizes this earth-shattering idea and has a slew of Batman books out. Every week you can read one. Batman, Batman, Inc., Batman & Robin (Robin is dead...but the book is still being published), Detective Comics, The Dark Knight. DC is smart. Marvel has a few Spider-Man titles...but one is a team-up book (that doesn't count) and the other one has a black kid as Spider-Man. That leaves one...ONE...Spider-Man title. And Peter Parker is dead and Dr. Octopus is Spider-Man now. So that doesn't even really count. Marvel...what the fuck? You have one of comic's best characters. Why aren't there more Spider-Man books?
I've been looking forward to this book for awhile. Sad to say, it's average at best so far. I do love Frank Quitely's art and, damn, when was the last time he penciled a full issue? One of the early Batman & Robin books three or so years ago, right? It is nice to see him back. His art is great as usual but the colors aren't dynamic enough (it probably doesn't help that they got the same guy, Peter Doherty, to do the colors, design, and lettering). The story by Mark Millar at least has an intriguing premise: two famed U.S. superheroes have kids struggling to live/thrive/survive in their shadow. Why this book just isn't as spectacular as I had hoped is because Millar usually goes balls to the wall and over the top and he provides excitement. This book is closer to PG-13 than R...and rather dull. Hopefully it picks up. ** (out of ****)
YOUNG AVENGERS #1: Well the fanboys on the internet are in an orgiastic frenzy over this. Will that translate to sales? Probably not (go ask Journey into Mystery). The fact that this book is, so far, awful certainly won't help. Granted, it's only one issue. Perhaps it's setting up awesome things to come. Writer Keiron Gillen doesn't seem to understand that you have to hook people early. A #1 issue should blow your mind and make you salivate for #2. This book is just...boring. It's also fucking confusing as hell. It feels like this is issue #12 or something. There's barely an introduction to anyone. I have no clue who these people are besides Kid Loki and Hawkeye's girl friend. Very terrible stuff. -No Stars-
CHEW #31: So this is the start of the second half of this book. I guess it's stopping at #60 for no real reason. This book could either be better as a monthly forever book or one that stopped at #12. I'm not sure because it has gotten a little stale but it is still amusing and fun. Tony's sister was dismembered and murdered in #30 so this is the funeral. Plus we have the boys working on a case involving deadly energy drinks. With a funeral you'd expect this book to at least show some emotion and swerve a bit but it's all one note fluff. For a book to go sixty issues it really needs to produce more than comedy hijinks. **


Hell has frozen over. There actually was something worthwhile in these Before Watchmen books. First off, the entire line is pointless. Alan Moore's book already delved into the past of all the characters. Second, this book, Silk Spectre, was trite. Written by Darwyn Cook and Amanda Conner, the story involved the psychedelic 60's San Francisco and a drug introduced into the hippie community that made them want to buy material things. Yes, it was stupid. But the art! Oh, God, what glorious, colorful Archie-esque art by Amanda Conner and colorist Paul Mounts. The story was okay but I looked forward to each issue just to look at it. Conner, sadly, rarely draws, and it's a shame that DC wasted so much talent on this bad idea that was Before Watchmen but at least we got the best art of the year out of it. It's something.


I think the biggest story in comics this past year was the return of writer Brian K. Vaughn. I think that says a lot that the return of a writer is actually a big story. That his and Fiona Staples' new book, Saga, turned out to be incredibly entertaining and fun and weird and gorgeous is almost a given. The other big deal was the fact that so many books I read ended (Scalped, Sweet Tooth, I Zombie, The Boys). Some books kept chugging along; Image published the 100th issue of The Walking Dead (poor Glenn). Image also re-booted a handful of old Rob Liefeld books and, surprise surprise, Glory turned out to be phenomenal. DC had their first full year of their "new 52" and Batman was the star thanks to great art by Greg Capullo and some very dark and interesting stories by Scott Snyder involving The Joker and The Court of Owls. Marvel copied DC and re-started a bunch of titles with new #1's and shuffled the writers/artists around...and Hawkeye turned out to be their book of the year. Oh, and Peter Parker died. Yeah. So it was an eventful year.